Every FBS game this week, scored against the spread. Move a slider to change how much each factor counts; every game and the back-test update as you go.
Informational only. This page computes a lean from public game data; it is not betting advice, and no wagering is offered or arranged here. If you bet, do it legally and within your means.
Turn the dials
1.0× is the weight the data fitted. 0× switches a factor off; 2× doubles it.
Week 10, 2026 season
Air Force at Army
Sat, Nov 7 · 7:30 PM ET
LineArmy −3.5
Slight lean · Army
Slight lean to Army to cover: our margin says Army by 5.2, and the line is Army −3.5.
Our margin
Army by 5.2
Edge vs. line
+1.7 pts
Cover chance
49%
How this was scored
Factor
Home minus away
Weight × fit
Points
Power rating
+48
1.00 × +0.0417
+2.0
Recent form
−3.75
1.00 × +0.0131
−0.0
Rest edge
0.00
1.00 × +0.0685
0.0
Cover trend
−0.25
1.00 × +0.1738
−0.0
Home field
+1.00
1.00 × +3.3304
+3.3
Our margin (home minus away)
+5.2
The line, as a home margin
+3.5
Edge
+1.7
Line source: median closing spread of 2 sportsbooks via CollegeFootballData.com. Cover chance is how often games with an edge of 1+ points covered at these settings since 2014(the table above). It is the record for edges this size, not the formula's confidence.
Iowa at Northwestern
Sat, Nov 7 · 7:30 PM ET
LineIowa −2.75
Coin flip · Iowa
Coin flip: our margin (Iowa by 3.4) is within a point of the line (Iowa −2.75), so the numbers don't separate the two sides.
Our margin
Iowa by 3.4
Edge vs. line
−0.6 pts
Cover chance
50%
How this was scored
Factor
Home minus away
Weight × fit
Points
Power rating
−163
1.00 × +0.0417
−6.8
Recent form
+6.75
1.00 × +0.0131
+0.1
Rest edge
0.00
1.00 × +0.0685
0.0
Cover trend
0.00
1.00 × +0.1738
0.0
Home field
+1.00
1.00 × +3.3304
+3.3
Our margin (home minus away)
−3.4
The line, as a home margin
−2.8
Edge
−0.6
Line source: median closing spread of 2 sportsbooks via CollegeFootballData.com. Cover chance is how often games with an edge of 0+ points covered at these settings since 2014(the table above). It is the record for edges this size, not the formula's confidence.
Colorado at Arizona State
Sat, Nov 7 · 7:30 PM ET
LineArizona State −3.25
Strong lean · Arizona State
Strong lean to Arizona State to cover: our margin says Arizona State by 12.0, and the line is Arizona State −3.25.
Our margin
Arizona State by 12.0
Edge vs. line
+8.7 pts
Cover chance
49%
How this was scored
Factor
Home minus away
Weight × fit
Points
Power rating
+203
1.00 × +0.0417
+8.5
Recent form
+12.25
1.00 × +0.0131
+0.2
Rest edge
0.00
1.00 × +0.0685
0.0
Cover trend
+0.25
1.00 × +0.1738
+0.0
Home field
+1.00
1.00 × +3.3304
+3.3
Our margin (home minus away)
+12.0
The line, as a home margin
+3.3
Edge
+8.7
Line source: median closing spread of 2 sportsbooks via CollegeFootballData.com. Cover chance is how often games with an edge of 5+ points covered at these settings since 2014(the table above). It is the record for edges this size, not the formula's confidence.
Miami at Notre Dame
Sat, Nov 7 · 7:30 PM ET
LineNotre Dame −7.25
Coin flip · Miami
Coin flip: our margin (Notre Dame by 6.7) is within a point of the line (Notre Dame −7.25), so the numbers don't separate the two sides.
Our margin
Notre Dame by 6.7
Edge vs. line
−0.6 pts
Cover chance
50%
How this was scored
Factor
Home minus away
Weight × fit
Points
Power rating
+80
1.00 × +0.0417
+3.3
Recent form
+3.00
1.00 × +0.0131
+0.0
Rest edge
0.00
1.00 × +0.0685
0.0
Cover trend
−0.17
1.00 × +0.1738
−0.0
Home field
+1.00
1.00 × +3.3304
+3.3
Our margin (home minus away)
+6.7
The line, as a home margin
+7.3
Edge
−0.6
Line source: median closing spread of 2 sportsbooks via CollegeFootballData.com. Cover chance is how often games with an edge of 0+ points covered at these settings since 2014(the table above). It is the record for edges this size, not the formula's confidence.
Georgia at Ole Miss
Sat, Nov 7 · 7:30 PM ET
LineGeorgia −3.5
Lean · Ole Miss
Lean to Ole Miss to cover: our margin says Ole Miss by 0.8, and the line is Georgia −3.5.
Our margin
Ole Miss by 0.8
Edge vs. line
+4.3 pts
Cover chance
49%
How this was scored
Factor
Home minus away
Weight × fit
Points
Power rating
−64
1.00 × +0.0417
−2.7
Recent form
+10.75
1.00 × +0.0131
+0.1
Rest edge
0.00
1.00 × +0.0685
0.0
Cover trend
0.00
1.00 × +0.1738
0.0
Home field
+1.00
1.00 × +3.3304
+3.3
Our margin (home minus away)
+0.8
The line, as a home margin
−3.5
Edge
+4.3
Line source: median closing spread of 2 sportsbooks via CollegeFootballData.com. Cover chance is how often games with an edge of 3+ points covered at these settings since 2014(the table above). It is the record for edges this size, not the formula's confidence.
Louisville at Georgia Tech
Sat, Nov 7 · 7:30 PM ET
LineLouisville −14.75
Slight lean · Georgia Tech
Slight lean to Georgia Tech to cover: our margin says Louisville by 11.8, and the line is Louisville −14.75.
Our margin
Louisville by 11.8
Edge vs. line
+3.0 pts
Cover chance
49%
How this was scored
Factor
Home minus away
Weight × fit
Points
Power rating
−352
1.00 × +0.0417
−14.7
Recent form
−27.25
1.00 × +0.0131
−0.4
Rest edge
0.00
1.00 × +0.0685
0.0
Cover trend
−0.33
1.00 × +0.1738
−0.1
Home field
+1.00
1.00 × +3.3304
+3.3
Our margin (home minus away)
−11.8
The line, as a home margin
−14.8
Edge
+3.0
Line source: median closing spread of 2 sportsbooks via CollegeFootballData.com. Cover chance is how often games with an edge of 1+ points covered at these settings since 2014(the table above). It is the record for edges this size, not the formula's confidence.
Michigan State at Michigan
Sat, Nov 7 · 7:30 PM ET
LineMichigan −14
Coin flip · Michigan
Coin flip: our margin (Michigan by 14.5) is within a point of the line (Michigan −14), so the numbers don't separate the two sides.
Our margin
Michigan by 14.5
Edge vs. line
+0.5 pts
Cover chance
50%
How this was scored
Factor
Home minus away
Weight × fit
Points
Power rating
+276
1.00 × +0.0417
+11.5
Recent form
+11.75
1.00 × +0.0131
+0.2
Rest edge
−7.00
1.00 × +0.0685
−0.5
Cover trend
−0.17
1.00 × +0.1738
−0.0
Home field
+1.00
1.00 × +3.3304
+3.3
Our margin (home minus away)
+14.5
The line, as a home margin
+14.0
Edge
+0.5
Line source: median closing spread of 2 sportsbooks via CollegeFootballData.com. Cover chance is how often games with an edge of 0+ points covered at these settings since 2014(the table above). It is the record for edges this size, not the formula's confidence.
Oklahoma at Florida
Sat, Nov 7 · 7:45 PM ET
LineFlorida −4.75
Lean · Oklahoma
Lean to Oklahoma to cover: our margin says Florida by 1.2, and the line is Florida −4.75.
Our margin
Florida by 1.2
Edge vs. line
−3.5 pts
Cover chance
49%
How this was scored
Factor
Home minus away
Weight × fit
Points
Power rating
−47
1.00 × +0.0417
−2.0
Recent form
−12.25
1.00 × +0.0131
−0.2
Rest edge
0.00
1.00 × +0.0685
0.0
Cover trend
+0.17
1.00 × +0.1738
+0.0
Home field
+1.00
1.00 × +3.3304
+3.3
Our margin (home minus away)
+1.2
The line, as a home margin
+4.8
Edge
−3.5
Line source: median closing spread of 2 sportsbooks via CollegeFootballData.com. Cover chance is how often games with an edge of 3+ points covered at these settings since 2014(the table above). It is the record for edges this size, not the formula's confidence.
Liberty at New Mexico State
Sat, Nov 7 · 8:00 PM ET
LineLiberty −15.25
Strong lean · Liberty
Strong lean to Liberty to cover: our margin says Liberty by 23.2, and the line is Liberty −15.25.
Our margin
Liberty by 23.2
Edge vs. line
−7.9 pts
Cover chance
49%
How this was scored
Factor
Home minus away
Weight × fit
Points
Power rating
−628
1.00 × +0.0417
−26.2
Recent form
−32.75
1.00 × +0.0131
−0.4
Rest edge
+3.00
1.00 × +0.0685
+0.2
Cover trend
−0.67
1.00 × +0.1738
−0.1
Home field
+1.00
1.00 × +3.3304
+3.3
Our margin (home minus away)
−23.2
The line, as a home margin
−15.3
Edge
−7.9
Line source: median closing spread of 2 sportsbooks via CollegeFootballData.com. Cover chance is how often games with an edge of 5+ points covered at these settings since 2014(the table above). It is the record for edges this size, not the formula's confidence.
West Virginia at Texas Tech
Sat, Nov 7 · 9:30 PM ET
LineTexas Tech −16.5
Strong lean · Texas Tech
Strong lean to Texas Tech to cover: our margin says Texas Tech by 22.6, and the line is Texas Tech −16.5.
Our margin
Texas Tech by 22.6
Edge vs. line
+6.1 pts
Cover chance
49%
How this was scored
Factor
Home minus away
Weight × fit
Points
Power rating
+468
1.00 × +0.0417
+19.5
Recent form
+15.50
1.00 × +0.0131
+0.2
Rest edge
−7.00
1.00 × +0.0685
−0.5
Cover trend
+0.08
1.00 × +0.1738
+0.0
Home field
+1.00
1.00 × +3.3304
+3.3
Our margin (home minus away)
+22.6
The line, as a home margin
+16.5
Edge
+6.1
Line source: median closing spread of 2 sportsbooks via CollegeFootballData.com. Cover chance is how often games with an edge of 5+ points covered at these settings since 2014(the table above). It is the record for edges this size, not the formula's confidence.
Fresno State at Utah State
Sat, Nov 7 · 9:30 PM ET
LineFresno State −1.25
Strong lean · Fresno State
Strong lean to Fresno State to cover: our margin says Fresno State by 8.4, and the line is Fresno State −1.25.
Our margin
Fresno State by 8.4
Edge vs. line
−7.1 pts
Cover chance
49%
How this was scored
Factor
Home minus away
Weight × fit
Points
Power rating
−278
1.00 × +0.0417
−11.6
Recent form
−7.50
1.00 × +0.0131
−0.1
Rest edge
0.00
1.00 × +0.0685
0.0
Cover trend
−0.17
1.00 × +0.1738
−0.0
Home field
+1.00
1.00 × +3.3304
+3.3
Our margin (home minus away)
−8.4
The line, as a home margin
−1.3
Edge
−7.1
Line source: median closing spread of 2 sportsbooks via CollegeFootballData.com. Cover chance is how often games with an edge of 5+ points covered at these settings since 2014(the table above). It is the record for edges this size, not the formula's confidence.
Hawai'i at UTEP
Sat, Nov 7 · 9:30 PM ET
LineHawai'i −7.5
Strong lean · Hawai'i
Strong lean to Hawai'i to cover: our margin says Hawai'i by 15.3, and the line is Hawai'i −7.5.
Our margin
Hawai'i by 15.3
Edge vs. line
−7.8 pts
Cover chance
49%
How this was scored
Factor
Home minus away
Weight × fit
Points
Power rating
−423
1.00 × +0.0417
−17.6
Recent form
−27.50
1.00 × +0.0131
−0.4
Rest edge
−7.00
1.00 × +0.0685
−0.5
Cover trend
−0.67
1.00 × +0.1738
−0.1
Home field
+1.00
1.00 × +3.3304
+3.3
Our margin (home minus away)
−15.3
The line, as a home margin
−7.5
Edge
−7.8
Line source: median closing spread of 2 sportsbooks via CollegeFootballData.com. Cover chance is how often games with an edge of 5+ points covered at these settings since 2014(the table above). It is the record for edges this size, not the formula's confidence.
Texas State at Oregon State
Sat, Nov 7 · 10:30 PM ET
LineOregon State −5
Slight lean · Texas State
Slight lean to Texas State to cover: our margin says Oregon State by 3.9, and the line is Oregon State −5.
Our margin
Oregon State by 3.9
Edge vs. line
−1.1 pts
Cover chance
49%
How this was scored
Factor
Home minus away
Weight × fit
Points
Power rating
+9
1.00 × +0.0417
+0.4
Recent form
+11.25
1.00 × +0.0131
+0.1
Rest edge
0.00
1.00 × +0.0685
0.0
Cover trend
+0.17
1.00 × +0.1738
+0.0
Home field
+1.00
1.00 × +3.3304
+3.3
Our margin (home minus away)
+3.9
The line, as a home margin
+5.0
Edge
−1.1
Line source: median closing spread of 2 sportsbooks via CollegeFootballData.com. Cover chance is how often games with an edge of 1+ points covered at these settings since 2014(the table above). It is the record for edges this size, not the formula's confidence.
Wyoming at UNLV
Sat, Nov 7 · 10:30 PM ET
LineUNLV −3.5
Lean · UNLV
Lean to UNLV to cover: our margin says UNLV by 7.6, and the line is UNLV −3.5.
Our margin
UNLV by 7.6
Edge vs. line
+4.1 pts
Cover chance
49%
How this was scored
Factor
Home minus away
Weight × fit
Points
Power rating
+114
1.00 × +0.0417
+4.8
Recent form
+1.00
1.00 × +0.0131
+0.0
Rest edge
−7.00
1.00 × +0.0685
−0.5
Cover trend
−0.17
1.00 × +0.1738
−0.0
Home field
+1.00
1.00 × +3.3304
+3.3
Our margin (home minus away)
+7.6
The line, as a home margin
+3.5
Edge
+4.1
Line source: median closing spread of 2 sportsbooks via CollegeFootballData.com. Cover chance is how often games with an edge of 3+ points covered at these settings since 2014(the table above). It is the record for edges this size, not the formula's confidence.
How often these settings have been right
The honest number first: at the fitted weights, scoring each season with weights fitted only on the seasons before it, the formula has picked the covering side 49.7% of the time (4,328–4,385–160, 2015–2026). That is a coin flip. The table below scores games the weights have already seen, and moves with the dials.
At these settings the formula has picked the covering side 49.6% of the time since 2014, below the 52.4% a bettor needs to break even at standard −110 pricing.
When the edge is
Record (W–L–P)
Cover rate
any size
4689–4772–172
49.6%
1+ points
3942–4030–145
49.4%
3+ points
2572–2650–94
49.3%
5+ points
1574–1640–47
49.0%
The table is in-sample: every game from 2014 through 2026 (9,633 games) scored with the factors as they stood before kickoff, against the median closing line of the books CollegeFootballData.com reports. Tuning the dials to raise this number is fitting the past, not predicting the future.
Results through 2026 week 10 (last game 2026-11-07). Lines: CollegeFootballData.com, one snapshot a day.
How it works
For each game we compute five numbers about the home team relative to the away team, multiply each by a fitted coefficient and the weight you set, and add them up. That sum is our expected home margin. The edge is that margin minus the line.
Our margin (home − away) =
w₁ × +0.0417 × Elo difference
+ w₂ × +0.0131 × form difference (avg margin, last 4 games)
+ w₃ × +0.0685 × rest difference (days, capped at 14)
+ w₄ × +0.1738 × cover-rate difference (last 6 games)
+ w₅ × +3.3304 × home game (1, or 0 at a neutral site)
Edge = our margin − the line (written as a home margin)
Cover chance = how often past games with an edge that size covered
The coefficients are an ordinary least-squares fit of actual final margins on those five factors over every FBS-against-FBS game with a posted line from 2014 through 2026 (9,633 games), refit each time the page regenerates. Each slider (w) scales one coefficient: 1.0× is the fit, 0× removes the factor.
The cover chance is the record, not a bell-curve reading of the edge. In college football a bigger edge has not meant a likelier cover: since 2014, games where the formula disagreed with the line by five points or more covered no more often than games where it barely disagreed. So each game shows the back-test's cover rate for edges its size, at the settings you have chosen. A “strong lean” here means the formula and the line are far apart, not that the formula is likely right.
The five factors
Power rating. CollegeFootballData.com's pre-game Elo rating for each team, published with every game. It is their rating, not ours: the NFL dial computes its own Elo, but there is no published college method to follow, so this dial takes theirs as it stands.
Recent form. Each team's average points margin over its last four games against FBS opponents, whichever season they fell in.
Rest edge. Days since each team last played an FBS opponent, capped at 14 so a bye and an off-season count the same.
Cover trend. The share of its last six lined games each team covered the closing spread (a push counts one half).
Home field. 1 when the home team is at its own stadium, 0 at a neutral site: conference title games, bowls, kickoff classics.
The signs are printed as the fit found them. Unlike the NFL, cover trend comes out positive here, and recent form adds almost nothing once the power rating is in, because the rating already moves with every result.
What the record is, and isn't
Two records, and the first is the one to trust. The out-of-sample record scores each season from 2015 on with coefficients fitted only on the seasons before it, at the fitted weights, so no graded game was seen by the fit that graded it.
Season
Fitted on
Record (W–L–P)
Cover rate
2015
2014–2014
378–377–10
50.1%
2016
2014–2015
359–385–16
48.3%
2017
2014–2016
378–379–19
49.9%
2018
2014–2017
372–387–13
49.0%
2019
2014–2018
368–395–11
48.2%
2020
2014–2019
271–253–10
51.7%
2021
2014–2020
372–387–11
49.0%
2022
2014–2021
381–382–13
49.9%
2023
2014–2022
396–381–15
51.0%
2024
2014–2023
385–396–17
49.3%
2025
2014–2024
395–396–17
49.9%
2026
2014–2025
273–267–8
50.6%
All
4,328–4,385–160
49.7%
The back-test below the games replays the fitted games with the factors as they stood before each kickoff and counts how often the side the formula leaned to covered. It is in-sample, so it flatters the default settings, and moving a dial to push it up is curve-fitting. Both records are graded against the median closing spread of the books CollegeFootballData.com reports for each game, not the line you see during the week.
What it leaves out
Games against FCS teams, on the board and in the fit.
Quarterback changes and injuries. The NFL dial reads each week's starter from its schedule file; no public college source names starters before kickoff, so this dial cannot.
Play-by-play efficiency, weather, coaching changes and transfers. None are in the inputs.
Line movement. The line is a snapshot taken once a day; a book's number when you look may differ.
Sources
CollegeFootballData.com (API, used under its terms) — FBS scores, sites, pre-game Elo ratings and closing spreads from the books it tracks, 2013 onward.
Last reviewed: September 2026. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the NCAA, any conference or any school.
Frequently asked questions
Why does the record come out around 50%?
Because the closing line already prices in what public numbers know. Scored honestly, each season on weights fitted only on earlier seasons, this formula lands on a coin flip against it. A tool claiming much better from a simple public formula is either overfitting or not showing its record. The dial shows where the numbers disagree with the line and how that disagreement has fared; it does not beat the market.
Why only FBS against FBS?
Games against FCS teams often have no posted line, and the FCS side has little rating history, so they would add noise to the fit and blanks to the board. They are left out of both, and a team's recent form and rest count only its FBS games.
Where does the power rating come from?
CollegeFootballData.com publishes a pre-game Elo rating for every FBS team before every game. The NFL Spread Dial computes its own Elo from a published method; no equivalent method exists for college, so this dial uses CollegeFootballData's rating as published and says so.
Why is home field worth more here than in the NFL?
Because the fit says so. On FBS games since 2014 the home side has been worth about three points before any other factor, against under two in the NFL. Bigger crowds, longer trips and younger teams are the usual explanations; the dial only reports the number.